MTS

Minimum transport standard

and regional transport policy

The principle of transport policy usually resolves itself into detailed explanation of pronounced goals of transport progress. The same goals regarding population and consumers of transport services lead to Minimal Transport Standard (MTS).

MTS is an interrelated set of indices of end transport services consumption which are important in everyday life.

MTS is not branch indices of transport progress, MTS indicates how quality of life and business could be improved by means of transport.

Indicator-reference	the best present rates in developed countries	Total Derivation	Proposed rates	Actual rates
transport share in environmental pollution	18	+1.0	19	27.3
including share of motor transport in total transport pollution, %	60	50	75	90.8
transport provision reliability (level of transport accessibility), %	95	-12.0	68	65.03
including share of motor roads, %	80-95	-13.0	72	92.0
level of transport discrimination of population, %	0	+20.0	25	74.5
specific (man/week) free time lost fund, hours	0	2.7	3.7	9.77
auto-accidents level through road’s fault, one/1000 rides	0.5	-0.1	0.9	1.12
freight capacity of economy, thousands km / 1 USD of GDP	0.1	+0.5	3.5	5.83
annual population mobility with social culture aims, km/man	0.9 from diameter of inhabited territory	0.1	0.7 from diameter of inhabited territory	712
1. infrastructure of regional transport	60/40	15	80/20	40/60
infrastructure of urban passenger transport	50/50	0	50/50	45/55
share of public transport in passenger transportation, %	30 *	15	65	66
level of muscular transport modes development in urban and country traffic, %	35	10	30	0.1
level of roads permeability within regional borders, %	100	15	75	96,2
level of spatial unity in region, %	99	-10	80	69.6

Minimum transport standard of Krasnodar Region (2004)

Parameters of development
№	Parameters	Perspective	Calculated values	Degree of discrepancy
1	The share of transport in environmental pollution, %	<= 10,000	70,000	-60,000
2	The contribution of motor transport in total environmental pollution, %	<= 60,000	96,880	-36,880
3	Reliability of road provision, %	> 100,000	87,000	13,000
4	Level of transport discrimination of the population, %	<= 0,000	7,490	-7,490
5	Specific fund of the lost free time per 1 person/week, hour	<= 0,500	2,990	-2,490
6	Level of road accident on fault of motorways, number/100000 trip	<= 0,010	0,260	-0,250
7	Freight capacity of economy, t-km/1 USD GDP	0,100	0,520	-0,420
8	Mobility of the population with the social and cultural purposes, (% from diameter)	100,000	64,580	35,420
9	Share of expenses for a rolling stock for regional transport, %	70,000	40,000	30,000
10	Share of expenses for an infrastructure for regional transport, %	30,000	60,000	-30,000
11	Share of public transport in passenger transportations, %	85,000	73,840	11,160
12	Level of development of muscular types of transport (bicycle), %	22,000	0,100	21,900
13	Efficiency of financing	=> 1,550	0,200	1,350

The note:
! - lack
V - close to norm
+ - more than a sufficient level

[ Main ] [ About ] [ News ] [ Research ] [ White books ] [ Geogracom 5W ] [ Projects ]

[ Databases ] [ Publications ] [ MTS ] [ Links ] [ Futurology ] [ Charity ]

Send mail to soft@geogracom.ru with questions or comments about this web site. Last modified: May, 14 2007